Legal Opinion

Birmingham v. Lindemann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1951No. 15227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice.

Appellant Joe Birmingham sued appellee Victor R. Lindemann in the County Court at Law of Dallas County to recover from appellee the sum of $513, plus interest, penalties and attorney’s fees, due on a promissory note executed by appellee, which appellant purchased from Joseph Bell Martin and Roger Smith. Appellant *844did not plead over against Martin and Smith.

Appellee defended by way of cross action, alleging he executed the note as part payment on a residence which he purchased from Martin and Smith; that said note was not to become effective until said Martin and Smith finished…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graves v. Allert FuessTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Guardian Trust Co. v. BrothersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Adams Nat. Bank v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Hamilton-Turner Grocery Co. v. HanderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Golston v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. BettesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. New Home Construction Corporation v. O'NEILLCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. BettesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API