Legal Opinion

United States v. Donegan

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 4, 1988No. ACM 27057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MURDOCK, Judge:

This case was submitted to us on its merits. However, we find it presents a question of multiplicity for findings which we must address. The appellant was found guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of submitting a false claim for excess overseas housing allowance and larceny of the resulting money. He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for six months, and reduction to airman basic. We now hold that the specification alleging the false claim was multiplicious for findings with the specification alleging larceny.

This area of multiplicity is not without…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. GansU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. GrovesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. AutreyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. McKnightU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. ColeyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. GuronU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. DougalU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API