Legal Opinion

United States v. Groves

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 18, 1985No. CM 444650PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MARDEN, Senior Judge:

Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of larceny and making a false claim in violation of Articles 121 and 132, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 932 (1982). Both charges stem from appellant’s filing of a dependents’ travel and dislocation allowance claim form (DD Form 1351-4) for travel by one Nanely Groves and her daughters from El Paso, Texas, to Fort Hood, Texas, during July 1980. The Government proceeded on the theory that Nanely Groves was not the wife of the appellant, and hence the claim was false and fraudulent.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. RowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. William J. VandettiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. SicleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sheridon H. Groves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. BarrorU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. GrovesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. DoneganU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. DougalU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API