Legal Opinion

Alishausky v. MacDonald

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 27, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

This is an appeal from an appraisal of damages made by the highway commissioner for the taking for highway purposes of certain land with the buildings thereon owned by the plaintiff, under the provisions of § 269a of the General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1931, and §§ 1528 to 1531 of the Revision of 1930. The state referee, to whom the matter was referred, in his report, after reciting the preliminary steps taken in the proceeding and stating that he had viewed the premises, simply found that the plaintiff had sustained damages to a certain amount. The plaintiff filed a motion to recommit for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Fox v. City of South NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Mathews v. SheehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  4. Alexian Bros. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Forest Preserve District v. EckhoffIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Goldblatt v. FerrignoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. City of Renton v. Scott Pacific Terminal, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Harbor Construction Corporation v. DV Frione & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API