Legal Opinion

Clark v. Commanding Officer

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 70-177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

Petitioner, Joseph Clark, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on January 16, 1970, alleging that he had been unlawfully inducted into the United States Army. An Order to Show Cause was issued, and a hearing was held on January 20, 1970.

In support of his position, petitioner asserts: (1) That the local board considered his request for an occupational deferment on the merits but treated its action simply as a refusal to reopen, rather than a reclassification, and that he was thus denied an opportunity to appeal the classification in violation of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. David Arthur GeareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. Richard Glenn Keene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  4. United States Ex Rel. Berman v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  5. United States v. William E. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joseph Clark v. Commanding Officer, Commander Thomas M. Volatile, Armed Forces, Examining and Entrance Station and Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Garrell v. Commanding OfficerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Joseph Clark v. Commanding Officer, Commander Thomas M. Volatile, Armed Forces, Examining and Entrance Station and Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API