Legal Opinion
Uhl v. Swanstrom
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided February 21, 1995No. C 91-4012PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BENNETT, District Judge.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.1548
II. STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.1551
III. FINDINGS OF FACT.1553
IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS.1554
A. The Statute Of Limitations For § 1983 Claims.1555
1. The Applicable Statute.1555
2. Accrual Of A § 1983 Claim.1556
3. Tolling Of The Statute Of Limitations.1556
B. The Statute Of Limitations For Privacy Act Claims.'.1560
C. The Feres Doctrine.1561
1. Rationale For The Doctrine.1561
2. The Test For Applicability Of The Doctrine.1563
3. Claims To Which…
2Cases cited118 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Uhl v. SwanstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Flowers v. First Hawaiian BankDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2003
- Cummings v. Department of the NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Kenneth P. Uhl v. Dennis P. SwanstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Bourassa v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.