Legal Opinion
Munday v. Lampert
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 22, 2006No. 05-36095PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Paul Norman Munday appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. We affirm.
We review the denial of a habeas petition de novo. Lara v. Ryan, 455 F.3d 1080, 1084 (9th Cir.2006). In reviewing the merits of the petition, we apply the deferential standards of review set forth in the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). Under AEDPA, a habeas petition cannot be granted unless the state court decision was: (1) “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Joseph Torrey v. Wayne EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. John William FryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Anastacio Lara v. S. Ryan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kim v. Director, Virginia Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015