Legal Opinion
United States v. John William Fry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 18, 2003No. 01-17455PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge.
John William Fry sought habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, arguing that his counsel had ineffectively assisted him by not informing him that he could be deported if convicted, and by not objecting to the district court’s use of a preponderance-of-the-evidenee standard at sentencing. The district court denied the petition. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Fry was a salesperson at Legendary Concepts, where he participated in a fraudulent telemarketing scheme. In April 1997, he was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, of wire fraud, and of aiding and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Dario RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Monica Joyce CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Kwok Chee Kwan, AKA Jeff KwanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Chaidez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Denedo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.