Anastacio Lara v. S. Ryan, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Anastacio Lara (“Lara”) was convicted by a jury of two counts of attempted murder and two counts of non-aggravated mayhem. The jury was instructed that it could convict him of attempted murder under either a proper theory of express malice or an improper implied-malice theory. Lara brought a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that the flawed jury instruction made it impossible to determine whether he was convicted under the correct legal theory. The district court denied habeas relief, and we affirm.
I
The California Court of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Cortinas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Pulido v. ChronesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Michael Robert Pulido v. Chris Chrones, Warden, Michael Robert Pulido v. Chris Chrones, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.