Legal Opinion

Anastacio Lara v. S. Ryan, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2006No. 05-16055PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Anastacio Lara (“Lara”) was convicted by a jury of two counts of attempted murder and two counts of non-aggravated mayhem. The jury was instructed that it could convict him of attempted murder under either a proper theory of express malice or an improper implied-malice theory. Lara brought a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that the flawed jury instruction made it impossible to determine whether he was convicted under the correct legal theory. The district court denied habeas relief, and we affirm.

I

The California Court of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Cortinas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Pulido v. ChronesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Michael Robert Pulido v. Chris Chrones, Warden, Michael Robert Pulido v. Chris Chrones, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API