State v. Ovendale
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and one count of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. He raises four assignments of error, all but one of which we reject without discussion. We write to address only defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in admitting a diagnosis of “sexual abuse” into evidence during his jury trial. Defendant argues that, under State v. Southard, 347 Or 127, 218 P3d 104 (2009), a diagnosis of “sexual abuse” is never admissible in a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse. Alternatively, he argues that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. LupoliOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. LovernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Oates v. StumpOregon Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BeauvaisOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BeauvaisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. BeauvaisOregon Supreme Court · 2015