Legal Opinion

North Georgia Trust & Banking Co. v. Hulme

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 20, 1926No. 17114PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

“If one without notice sell to one with notice, the latter^ is protected, as otherwise a bona fide purchaser might be deprived of selling his property for full value.” Civil Code (1910), § 4535. Hancock v. Gumm, 151 Ga. 667 (2) (107 S. E. 872, 16 A. L. R. 1003) ; Branch v. Dublin and Laurens Bank, 21 Ga. App. 439 (94 S. E. 629). In the instant case, while it appears from the disputed testimony of the defendant that the plaintiff at one time had the note in its possession as custodian for the payee, and, while in such possession and prior to its maturity, was given notice by the defendant of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hancock v. GummSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Branch v. Dublin & Laurens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Houston v. LundyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API