Legal Opinion
U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. Jennings
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 4, 1999No. CV 97-26-PHX-RGS-OMP, CV97-394-PHX-RGS-OMP, CV97-1723-PHX-RGS-OM, CV97-1856-PHX-RGS-OM, CV97-1927-PHX-RGS-OM, CV97-2025-PHX-RGS-OM, CV97-2324-PHX-RGS-OM, CV97-342-PHX-RGS-OMP, CV97-626-PHX-RGS-OMP and CV97-629-PHX-RGS-OMPPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, District Judge.
These ten consolidated cases arise under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“the Act”), Pub.L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56, 47 U.S.C. § 153, et seq. US West Communications, Inc. (“US West”), the incumbent local exchange carrier (“ILEC”) in Arizona, is a party in each case. The Arizona Corporation Commission (“the ACC”), which regulates public utilities in Arizona, is a defendant in each case, as are the members of the ACC in their official capacities (“the Commissioners”).
Various prospective competitive local exchange carriers (“CLECs”) are parties to one or more…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. GTE Northwest, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1999
- U S West Communications, Inc. v. AT & T Communications of Pacific Northwest, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Hypolite v. Health Care Services of New York Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Inc. v. McMahonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2000
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2000
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Climax Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.