Legal Opinion
U S West Communications, Inc. v. AT & T Communications of Pacific Northwest, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 10, 1998No. Civ. 97-1575-JEPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JELDERKS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff U S West Communications, Inc. (“US West”) brings this action against AT & T Communications of the Pacific Northwest, Inc. (“AT & T”), MCImetro Access Transmission Services, Inc. (“MCI”), Sprint Communications Company (“Sprint”), the Oregon Public Utility Commission (“PUC”), and PUC Commissioners Roger Hamilton, Ron Eachus, and Joan Smith (“the Commissioners”). The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has participated in this proceeding as amicus curiae.
The dispute concerns interconnection agreements between U.S. West and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- U S West Communications, Inc. v. Worldcom Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mci Telecommunication Corporation v. Bell Atlantic-PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. Telecommunications Regulatory BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. GTE Northwest, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1999
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. JenningsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.