Legal Opinion
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. GTE Northwest, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 21, 1999No. Civil 97-1687-JEPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JELDERKS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs MCI Telecommunications Corp. and MCImetro Access Transmission Services, Inc. (collectively “MCI”), bring this action under 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(6) against GTE Northwest, Inc. (“GTE”), the Oregon Public Utility Commission (“PUC”), and PUC Commissioners Roger Hamilton, Ron Eachus, and Joan Smith (“the Commissioners”). GTE has asserted counter-claims against MCI and cross-claims against the PUC.
At issue are the terms of an interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) between MCI and GTE, which is intended to facilitate competition in…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Brittmon v. Upreach, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Verizon North, Inc. v. John G. Strand, Chairman John C. Shea, Commissioner and David A. Svanda, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Hypolite v. Health Care Services of New York Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Inc. v. McMahonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.