Legal Opinion

First Union National Bank v. Rolfe

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1986No. 8630SC509PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

We must reverse the trial court’s denial of Mrs. Rolfe’s motion for relief from the 30 April 1985 order declaring that none of her property in this State is exempt from execution. Mrs. Rolfe is entitled to relief from that order because it was entered without notice to her in violation of rights guaranteed her by our Constitution and statutes.

Every resident of North Carolina is entitled to claim certain of his property as exempt from sale to satisfy the claims of his creditors. N. C. Const., Art. 10; G.S. 1C-1601 et seq. Only a resident of this State, however, may claim the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. In re WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Cromer v. . SelfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnett v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Helbein v. Southern Metals Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. First Union National Bank v. RolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API