Legal Opinion

Penn Advertising, Inc. v. Kring

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1989No. 2981 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County granting the peremptory judgment motion 1 of the Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) of Breck nock Township, William E. Kring, the zoning officer, and the Board of Supervisors for the Township (collectively Appellees), and dismissing the motion of Penn Advertising Inc. (Penn Inc.), appellant, for summary or peremptory judgment in mandamus to compel the ZHB to grant a “deemed approval” 2 to Penn Inc.’s request for a variance.

The uncontested facts are as follows: Penn Inc. entered into a lease agreement with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foltz v. MonroevilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. East Lansdowne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Wolgemuth v. KleinfelterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Middletown Township v. Delaware County Institution DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Bucks County Housing Development Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grim v. Borough of BoyertownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Sidlow v. Township of Nether ProvidenceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Rodier v. Township of RidleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Willistown TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Masloff v. BascovskyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API