Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Forish
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 23, 2004No. 01-P-535PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.
Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, and after a bench trial, the defendant was convicted of possession of a machine gun (G. L. c. 269, § 10[c]) (two counts) and discharging a firearm within 500 feet of a dwelling (G. L. c. 269, § 12E). On appeal, this court affirmed the defendant’s convictions for illegal possession of a machine gun and for discharging a firearm. See Commonwealth v. Forish, 56 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (2002). Thereafter, the United States Supreme Court granted the defendant’s petition for a writ of certiorari and remanded the case to this court for further…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. St. LouisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. ValerioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. AriasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. ToledoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.