Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Toledo

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 12, 2006No. 05-P-1010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laurence J.

Pursuant to a search warrant, Boston police officers seized firearms, ammunition, and drugs from the residence of defendant Fernando Toledo (Fernando) at 80 West Dedham Street, Boston. Fernando moved to suppress the evidence seized, asserting that (1) the warrant was constitutionally and statutorily invalid because it failed to describe with sufficient particularity the premises to be searched; and (2) the search was illegal because the affidavit in support of the warrant failed to establish probable cause. A codefendant, Pablo Charles Toledo (Pablo), joined in that motion.2 After…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ValerioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. ZimmermannMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. HamiltonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. MillsMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009
  5. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API