Legal Opinion

Frankfort Land Co. v. Hughett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FROM MORGAN.' --. Error to the Chancery Court of Morgan County. • — A: H.- Robeets, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice GteeeN

The Frankfort Land Company filed its original bill in ejectment May 23, 1910, in the chancery court of Morgan county, against defendants Jasper Hugh-ett, J. E. Rich, and C. A. -Quinn, to recover two tracts of land in Morgan county, to remove clouds upon its title, and seeking a decree for the value of timber cut and taken away.

At the May term, 1911, of the said court the bill was amended by making the Loomis & Hart Manufacturing Company a party defendant. This amendment was made by permission of the court, and was done by interlining the name of the said corporation in the caption of the bill…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Dougherty v. ChesnuttTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Morgan Bros. v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Louisville Property Co. v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Whitaker v. PostonTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. v. Elvisly Yours, Inc. Elvisly Yours, Ltd. Sid ShawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. Bodne v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Irwin v. DawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Bouldin v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. W.E. Richmond Co. v. Security Nat. Bk.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API