Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Reichert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 12, 1997, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
In our view, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimant’s late return from lunch constituted disqualifying misconduct in this instance. Claimant’s supervisor testified *710that claimant, a bookkeeper, had been repeatedly warned that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of BarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of WayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.