Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Holland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 1999PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 13, 1997, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

*924Claimant was discharged from her employment as a customer service agent after failing to timely advise the employer that she would be late for work on June 1, 1996. Claimant, who had been previously warned regarding her attendance record, was aware of the employer’s rule whereby employees who failed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of ReichertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Skowronski v. MordinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Hollamon v. VinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Loveless v. American Reffuel Co. of Niagara, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Sandquist v. ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Karas v. Corning HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API