Legal Opinion
THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C. v. HARTLEIB
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 17, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02728Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE WEISER LAW FIRM, et al., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, NO. 2:19-cv-2728-KSM v. MICHAEL HARTLEIB, Defendant. MEMORANDUM MARSTON, J. November 17, 2020 Plaintiffs the Weiser Law Firm, P.C., (“the Firm”) and Robert Weiser, Esquire, have sued Defendant Michael Hartleib, alleging that Hartleib, a former potential client of the Firm, has frequently (and improperly) inserted himself into litigations in which they were involved and has publicly disparaged and attacked Plaintiffs to others. (Doc. No. 1.)1 In their complaint,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Metcalfe v. Renaissance Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Leonardo Martino and Trans One Ii, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Urvashi Bhatnagar, an Infant by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Kalpana Bhatnagar Kalpana Bhatnagar, Individually v. Surrendra Overseas Limited Apeejay Lines, in Personam M v. Apj Karan, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc. In Rem, Surrendra Overseas Limited, to the Res Apeejay Lines, in Personam and the M/v Apj Karan, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc. In Rem, in No. 93-2059. Urvashi Bhatnagar, an Infant by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Kalpana Bhatnagar Kalpana Bhatnagar, Individually v. Surrendra Overseas Limited Apeejay Lines, in Personam M v. Apj Karan, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc. In Rem, Urvashi Bhatnagar, an Infant by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Kalpana Bhatnagar, and Kalpana Bhatnagar, Individually, in No. 93-2076Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.