Cooper v. Peturis
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from a denial of plaintiff Cooper's motion for new trial on the ground that the jury verdict was against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. We have carefully reviewed the record and do not agree with plaintiff that the verdict is without support. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Plaintiff, in alternative counts, claimed that defendant Peturis had damaged his soybean crop while aerially spraying a herbicide, a chemical known commercially as Banvel, upon property which adjoined his land. The trial court granted defendant's motion for a directed verdict…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Elba Wood Products, Inc. v. BrackinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Grandquest v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Walker v. CardwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Trans-South-Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. WeinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Gleichert v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. LavoieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ashbee v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- American Furniture Galleries v. McWane, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Pate v. Sunset Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.