Daniello v. Daniello
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJames J. Crisona, J.
In a separation action, the duly-appointed receiver in sequestration moves, pursuant to section 1171-a of the Civil Practice Act, to require Manhattan Color Laboratory, Inc., hereinafter called Manhattan, and/or its president, Selwyn Bobbins, to deliver to him certain sums of money allegedly belonging to the defendant.
The defendant had owned stock in Manhattan, but shortly before this action for separation was commenced he entered into an agreement in which Manhattan contracted to redeem his stock. The agreement provided in pertinent part that $40,800 was to be paid to redeem the defendant’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Paddock v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- Patterson v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Myers v. MyersNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Patillo v. PatilloNew York Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Neidorf v. NeidorfNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Murphy v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1968