Legal Opinion

Beards v. Dailey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1979No. TC A 77 06 08071, CA 11279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TONGUE, J.,

Pro Tempore.

Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion to set aside an order of default and judgment entered against them.

While recognizing that relief from the entry of a default judgment is within the discretion of the trial court, defendants contend that such discretion must be exercised in such a manner as not to defeat the ends of substantial justice. Defendants then recite facts to support their contention that it was unjust to enter a judgment against them. Defendants seek to excuse their failure to engage a lawyer to enter an appearance on their behalf when served…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogue Valley Memorial Hospital v. Salem Insurance Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Haines Commercial Equipment Co. v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. St. Arnold v. Star Expansion IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Steeves v. SteevesOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Koukal v. COY ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. AtwoodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API