Legal Opinion

Koukal v. COY ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants Frank E. Coy and Beth Coy, husband and wife, from a judgment which the circuit court entered March 7, 1956, against them in favor of the plaintiff, after it had entered an order which found them in default and had later overruled a motion of the defendants to vacate that order.

The basis of the action was an injury which the plaintiff suffered January 4, 1955, in this state while riding in an automobile owned by the defendants and which was driven on that occasion by the defendant Beth Coy. The defendants reside in the city of Moses Lake, Washington. Service…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Steeves v. SteevesOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Lovejoy v. Willamette Locks Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. BrukSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Rogue Valley Memorial Hospital v. Salem Insurance Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stirling v. Dari-Delite, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. St. Arnold v. Star Expansion IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Day v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API