Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Hultman v. . Gilchrist

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 20, 1921, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the commissioner of the department of licenses of the city of New York to issue to the relators licenses to operate public hacks for hire in the streets of the city of New York.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 20, 1921, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the commissioner of the department of licenses of the city of New York to issue to the relators licenses to operate public hacks for hire in the streets of the city of New York. The relators herein applied to the commissioner for a license to be issued for taxicabs owned by them, but the commissioner refused to issue such licenses to the relators herein,…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gimprich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Doherty v. McElligottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Marburg v. ColeNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Brown v. McGinnisNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Fixler v. QuigleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API