Legal Opinion
Simpson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1916No. 2608PublishedCited by 26 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge. W. G. Simpson and another were convicted of offenses, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, District Judge.
Section 5209 of the Revised Statutes of the United States relating to national banking associations provides as follows:
“Every president, director, cashier, teller, clerk, or agent of any association, who embezzles,' abstracts, or willfully misapplies any of the moneys, funds, or credits, of the association; or who, without authority from the directors, is*942sues or puts in circulation any of the notes of the association; or who, without such authority, issues or puts forth any certificate of deposit, draws any order or bill of exchange, makes any acceptance, assigns any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ackley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- United States v. FeroDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1883
- Tiberg v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Troutman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Reass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.