Legal Opinion
Vanik Gasparian v. Atlantic Richfield Company, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 1994No. 93-55180Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
33 F.3d 58
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Vanik GASPARIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-55180.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 1, 1994.*
Decided Aug. 15, 1994.
1
Before: D.W. NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and KING,** District Judge.
2
MEMORANDUM***
3
Vanik Gasparian appeals…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Byron C. Darling, III v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- April Christine Bousman v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Blankenship v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1979
- John Robertson v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.