Legal Opinion

Serenity Springs, Inc. and Laura Ostergren v. The LaPorte County Convention and Visitors Bureau, by and through its Board of Managers

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 2014No. 46A04-1309-MI-470PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Serenity Springs appeals a judgment in favor of the LaPorte County Convention and Visitors Bureau (“the Bureau”) that permanently enjoined Serenity Springs from using the internet domain name visit-michigancitylaporte.com and transferred the domain name to the Bureau. As “Visit Michigan City LaPorte” was not a protect-able trade name and Serenity Springs’ use of it was not unfair competition, we reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

We set forth the facts underlying this appeal in Serenity Springs v. LaPorte Cnty. Convention & Visitors Bureau, 986 N.E.2d 314, 317-19…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blue Bell, Inc. v. Farah Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Indianapolis Downs, LLC v. HerrIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Hartzler v. Goshen Churn & Ladder Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Keaton and Keaton v. KeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Johnson v. GlassleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Serenity Springs, Inc. v. LaPorte County Convention & Visitors Bureau ex rel. Board of ManagersIndiana Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API