Legal Opinion

Keaton and Keaton v. Keaton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2006No. 02S03-0602-CV-67PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

Unfair competition includes both the tort of "passing off" and trade name infringement. We hold that "passing off" requires intentional misrepresentation or deception but trade name infringement does not.

Facts and Procedural History

In 1971 Walter and William Keaton, a father and son, established a partnership for the practice of law in Rushville, Indiana, under the name "Keaton and Keaton." In 1978, the firm incorporated under the name "Keaton and Keaton, P.C." (the "Rushville P.C."). Walter died in 1980 and William continued as the sole shareholder of the P.C., retaining the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Moseley v. v. Secret Catalogue, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Thaddeus Davids Co. v. Davids Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Carie v. PSI Energy, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. First Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. WhorleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Girl Scouts of Southern Illinois v. Vincennes Indiana Girls, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. MERIDIAN FINANCIAL ADVISORS, LTD. v. PenceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011
  4. Dwyer Instruments, Inc. v. Sensocon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
  5. Landeen v. PhoneBILLit, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API