Legal Opinion

In re the Extradition of Rojas

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 1, 2012No. 2012-01019-RBCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.

The issue in this matter is whether, in an extradition proceeding, the United States may introduce evidence by proffer in the absence of an objection by counsel for the defendant. The Extradition Hearing was held on March 19, 2012, and on March 23, 2012, the Court issued the following order:

ELECTRONIC PROCEDURAL ORDER entered re: IN THE MATTER OF THE EXTRADITION OF FERNANDO ANTONIO BURGOS ROJAS. At the Extradition Hearing on March 19, 2012, both the AUSA and the AFD ‘proffered’ two exhibits each and neither objected to the other’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Collins v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Lopez-Smith v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Desmond v. EggersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  4. In Re the Extradition of SantosDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
  5. Desautels v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API