Legal Opinion
Hickey v. Bomark Fabrics, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 12, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Final judgment entered September 30, 1982, affirmed, with $25 costs.
The holdover petition was properly dismissed because the premises of respondent Holli Schwartz are subject to rent stabilization by virtue of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 (L 1974, ch 576, § 4 [ETPA]). At the time respondent entered into possession in 1976, the building contained four class A and seven class B units; respondent occupied one of the class A units. Since that time, the premises have been altered to the extent that there are now seven class A units and no class B units. Upon the…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- La Guardia v. CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Tegreh Realty Corp. v. JoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
4Cited by10 opinions
- Eastern Pork Products Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Pape v. DoarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Romanow v. HellerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- Nelson v. YatesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Baxter v. Captain Crow Management, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.