Legal Opinion

Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Trussed Concrete Steel Co. of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1918No. 5905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

• Appeal from District Court, Bell County; F. M. Spann, Judge. Suit 'by the Trussed Concrete Steel Company of Texas and others against the Hess & Skinner Engineering Company and the Dion Bonding & Surety Company. From Judgment for plaintiffs, the Bonding & Surety Company appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Findings of Pact.

JENKINS, J.

Tlie city of Belton, a municipal corporation under the laws of this state, entered into a contract with Hess & Skinner Engineering Company for the construction of two bridges in said city, in accordance with certain specifications, for which it agreed to pay a certain price. The contractor was to furnish all material and labor. In so far as said contract related to a bond to be executed by the contractor, it was as follows:

“Said contractor agrees to execute a good and sufficient bond, acceptable by the said city, conditioned upon the faithful performance of this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. BowmanUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Johnson v. Erskine ex rel. HangerTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Colorado City National Bank v. Lester & HazzardTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Texas Glass & Paint Co. v. Southwestern Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Jacobs v. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Trinity Portland Cement Co. v. Lion Bonding & Surety Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Foust v. BibbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Scharbauer v. Lampasas CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Cooper v. H. H. Hardin & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API