Legal Opinion
Scharbauer v. Lampasas County
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 20, 1919No. 5941. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Lampasas Comity; F. M. Spann, Judge. Consolidated actions .by Lampasas County against the Hess & Skinner Engineering Company and others, wherein certain parties intervened, and John Scharbauer and others were made parties defendant. From judgment for plaintiff against John Schar-bauer and certain other defendants, etc., such defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.
We copy from appellants’ brief the following concededly correct statement:
“This is a consolidated action from the district court of Lampasas county, as follows:
“Cause No. 3218 was originally instituted by Lampasas county against Hess & Skinner Engineering Company and Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance Company to recover as against the one as principal and the other as surety upon a certain bridge building contract and bond. Cause No. 3220 was instituted by Lampasas county against A. R. Mace, sheriff of-said county, and against the Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Company, to determine the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Osburn v. SmartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Gill v. PayseeNevada Supreme Court · 1924
- Scharbauer v. Lampasas CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.