Legal Opinion
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Murphy Bros.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 15, 2011No. Case 10 C 1447PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougall, Trustee (collectively the “Fund”) sued Murphy Bros., Inc. (“Murphy”) for withdrawal liability pursuant to sections 502(g)(2) and 4301(b) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended by the Mul tiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”). 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(g)(2) & 1451(b). The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the Fund’s motion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harney v. Speedway SuperAmerica, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Burton SlotkyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Charles Talley, Jr. v. Vincent LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Union Asphalts & Roadoils, Inc. v. Mo-Kan Teamsters Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Board of Trustees of the Automobile Mechanics' Local No. 701 v. 6516 Ogden Avenue, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Laborers' Pension Fund v. Total Home Restoration 1 a/k/a THR 1, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022