Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1919No. 12280PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar M. Torrison, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

An application was filed with the Industrial Board on October 13, 1914, by Frank Blum, defendant in error, for adjustment of claim for injuries alleged to have been incurred by him while in the employ of Swift & Co. The arbitration committee decided that he was not entitled to compensation. On review the Industrial Board awarded compensation of $7.50 per week for a period of 416 weeks from April 10, 1914, and ordered that if at the expiration of that time Blum were living, he should recover from the plaintiff in error a pension of $257.60 a year, payable semimonthly, as long as he might live.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ohio Building Safety Vault Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Pekin Cooperage Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Peoria Railway Terminal Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. E. Baggot Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. McClure v. Georgia Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Plano Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Math Igler's Casino, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City of Chicago v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API