Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Cox
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 23, 1924No. 14013PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DICKSON, C.
The parties will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant as they were designated in the trial court.
On the 13th day of March, 1914, the plaintiff, Eugene Cox, being owner in fee of certain lands in Love county, Okla., conveyed the same by general warranty deed to one J. C. Rice, reserving, however, from the estate granted, the oil, gas and mineral rights in and under said' lands. The exception in the deed, was as follows:
“Excepting the oil, gas, and minerals and mineral rights, in and under said lands, which oil, gas and minerals and mineral rights, is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Barker v. Campbell-Ratcliff Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- McDuffie v. Geiser Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Prince v. GosnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hudson v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Myers v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Marshall v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Newcomer v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Bartlett v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.