Hopkins v. Blanco
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant contends that Article I, section 27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution compels the courts to extend the right to consortium to women who have long been denied that right under the common law.1
Consortium has normally been defined in terms of a husband’s right to be secure in his marital relationship : “ Tor an injury to the wife, either intentionally or negligently caused, which deprives her of the ability to perform services, or lessens that ability, the husband may maintain an action for loss of service. . . .’ ” Service “ implies whatever of aid, assistance,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Clouston v. Remlinger Oldsmobile Cadillac, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Tiernan v. DevoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Barry J. Quinones v. United States of America, and United States Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Its Agents and EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Hopkins v. BlancoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.