Legal Opinion

Virginia Corp. v. Galanis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 11, 1992No. 14474PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The dispositive issues in this appeal are: (1) whether three judgment liens of the defendant Armstrong Capital, S.A. (Armstrong), on a particular piece of property are entitled to priority, in a foreclosure action, over the mortgages of the plaintiff, Virginia Corporation, and one of the defendants, Consolidated Capital Corporation (Consolidated Capital), on that property; and (2) whether moneys expended to maintain property during a mortgage foreclosure proceed*438ing, authorized by the court, are to be given priority over the encumbrances on that property. The plaintiff brought this action to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Bizzoco v. ChinitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Zapolsky v. SacksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wendell Corp. Trustee v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. D'OnofrioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Dana Investment Corp. v. Schlesinger, No. Cv93 31 40 27 S (Nov. 13, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  4. Dime Savings Bank v. CornagliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Harborwalk v. Errato, No. 69638 (May 20, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API