Legal Opinion

Indiana State Board of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines Living Center, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1992No. 30A01-9105-CV-158PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

The issue we consider in this interlocutory appeal is whether computer simulations reflecting possible Medicaid reimbursement methodologies, that were considered but not adopted by the Indiana Department of Public Welfare (State) at a time when litigation had already commenced on the reimbursement scheme then in effect, are protected from discovery either as work product or by reason of a deliberative process privilege. The trial court ordered the State to comply with the plaintiff-class of long term health care facilities’ request for discovery of the simulations, identified…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Grossman v. SchwarzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Automated Geographic Reference CenterUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. William M. Giffin v. Jack Summerlin, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. National Engineering & Contracting Co. v. C & P Engineering & Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. New Jersey Ass'n of Health Care Facilities, Inc. v. GibbsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  5. State Wide Aluminum, Inc. v. Postle Distributors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API