Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Cross

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 12, 2011No. 11-74PublishedCited by 205 opinions

1Per curiam

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 28 U. S. C. § 2254, “imposes a highly deferen­tial standard for evaluating state-court rulings and demands that state-court decisions be given the benefit of the doubt.” Felkner v. Jackson, 562 U. S. 594, 598 (2011) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted). In this case, the Court of Appeals departed from this standard, and we therefore grant certiorari and reverse.

Irving Cross was tried for kidnaping and sexually assault­ing A. S. at knifepoint. Cross claimed that A. S. had con­sented to sex in exchange for money and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Felkner v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Irving Cross v. Anthony RamosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

3Cited by205 opinions

  1. People v. FuiavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Leroy Pooler v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Cardoza v. RockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. In Re Nice Systems, Ltd. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  5. Jones v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API