Legal Opinion

Long v. Bevers

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1936No. Civ. No. 1766Published

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages suffered by reason of the death of James M. Long, his minor son.

Defendant urges three grounds for a reversal of the judgment: (1) that the evidence shows no negligence on his part; (2) that it shows contributory negligence as a matter of law on the part of James; (3) errors of the trial court in rulings on the admissibility of evidence.

On August 19, 1934, James M. Long was of the age of thirteen years. He was in the seventh grade in junior high school and was an intelligent, quiclc-minded and well-developed youth. He was the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Benjamin v. NoonanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Skaggs v. WileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Lindenbaum v. BarbourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Gomez v. LindbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API