Legal Opinion

City of Toledo v. Bateson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1992No. L-92-032PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sherck, Judge.

This is an appeal from a suppression order issued by the Toledo Municipal Court which prohibited appellant, city of Toledo, from introducing into evidence testimony concerning the city’s inspection of a beauty salon. Because the trial court properly found appellant’s inspection violative of appellee’s right to be free from unreasonable searches, we affirm the suppression order.

On March 29, 1991, appellee, Rita Bateson, was cited by a city of Toledo Environmental Services inspector for failing to display “no smoking” signs in violation of Toledo Municipal Code 1779.02(c)(2). The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. City of Xenia v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Sweet Sage Café, LLC v. Town of N. Redington BeachDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API