Legal Opinion

United States v. Aviles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 30, 2000No. Nos. 96-10110, 97-10289, 96-10167, 97-10251PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The mandate is hereby recalled.

The opinion filed August 18, 1998 is amended at 170 F.3d 863, 869, § 7-10, 1.6, replace “these times not counting” with “the seventy day period excluding”;

1.7, replace “or” with “and”.

1.8, replace “United States v. Springer, 51 F.3d 861, 865 (9th Cir.1995) (finding an exclusion ... January 12, 1994)” with “United States v. Wirsing, 867 F.2d 1227, 1230 n. 6 (9th Cir.1989)”.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Rick Paul SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Craig Clark Wirsing and Arthur Robert LenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. James Daychild, United States of America v. Patrick O. NeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Jonathon Marc SutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Kim WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013