Legal Opinion
United States v. Craig Clark Wirsing and Arthur Robert Lenz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1989No. 87-1184, 87-1192PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, District Judge:
Defendants Craig Clark Wirsing and Arthur Robert Lenz appeal their criminal convictions, contending that the district court erred in not granting their motions to dismiss for violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). In particular, appellants challenge various rulings excluding time from Speedy Trial Act calculation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A complaint was filed against appellants, Donna Lee Anderson and Floyd Kermit Bowers, on July 14, 1986. All four defendants were subsequently…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Gregory Donnell Stafford, United States of America v. George GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Harry H. Nance, United States of America v. Leon Stelly, United States of America v. Taybren LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Elliott Van Brandy, Gardie Shine, and Charles PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Ross Furlow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. James Daychild, United States of America v. Patrick O. NeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Glen Butz Danner L. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Rick K. VoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Raymond James HoslettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Robert Larry Mayes, and Dallas Earl ScottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.