Doctor v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.
Claimant appeals from a final order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) affirming the referee’s decision, which denied petitioner unemployment benefits on the ground that she was not “available for work.” We affirm.
The issue is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the referee’s conclusion that claimant was not available for work. The facts are not in dispute. Claimant is an experienced registered nurse who last worked at a local hospital in McMinnville and left under non-disqualifying circumstances. On March 29, 1984, she was offered a full-time position with Chehalem Care Center, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Oliver v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Mallon v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- York v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carillo v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Carillo v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Troung v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985