Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Export-Import Bank
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant Export-Import Bank’s (“the Bank”) motion for summary judgment and plaintiff Judicial Watch’s cross-motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part, and plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
I. Facts
On May 22, 1999, Judicial Watch submitted a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request to the Bank. The Bank received Judicial Watch’s five-part request on May 25, 1999. Judicial Watch sought records pertaining to 1)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hertzberg v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Wolf v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.