Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Regil

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 25, 2012No. 11-P-434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRubin, J.

The defendant was convicted of violation of an abuse prevention order, in violation of G. L. c. 209A, § 7. The c. 209A order ordered the defendant “not to abuse the [p]laintiff [the victim in this case] by harming, threatening or attempting to harm the [pjlaintiff physically or by placing the [pjlaintiff in fear of imminent serious physical harm” and “not to contact the [p]laintiff.” Taken in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the testimony at trial showed that after the victim picked up her children from a visit with the defendant, the defendant threatened her in the presence of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. CottoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. FedericoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. SpencerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TorresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API