Commonwealth v. Cotto
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.
A jury in the District Court convicted the defendant, Joshua Cotto, of possession of a class D substance (marijuana), G. L. c. 94C, § 34, and carrying a firearm without a license, G. L. c. 269, § 10(a). He appeals, claiming that the trial judge erred by (1) not granting his motion for a required finding of not guilty, and (2) providing the jury with erroneous and *590misleading instructions regarding the elements of constructive possession and the burden of proof. We affirm.
Facts. On October 15, 2004, at approximately 2:20 a.m., State Troopers Daniel Tucker and Adam Mathieu were on patrol in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BeckettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- United States v. Glen Ray BirmleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Commonwealth v. AmazeenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MartinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ClaryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RomeroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. ElyseeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. CrappsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. McIntoshMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. ObioraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.